« Slow Subtle Erosion Of Fundamental PrinciplesHappy Thanksgiving 2009 »

We Need A Federal Shield Law Update-4

11/26/09

Permalink 10:20:36 am by first, Categories: News, Freedom of Press, Freedom of Speech, xPost_M

Originally Published February 19, 2008; Last Updated and Republished November 26, 2009:

United States District Court Judge Reggie B. Walton will hold USA Today reporter Toni Locy in contempt if she refuses to disclose a confidential source.

This case cries out for a federal shield law—it also highlights a potential con and the difficult choices confronting judges in the absence of a federal shield law.

Steven J. Hatfill was handled shabbily by our government in its efforts to discover who mailed four anthrax letters from New Jersey shortly after 9/11. Hatfill has filed a federal lawsuit for damages to his reputation and career.

Locy reported on the anthrax story based on a confidential source that was promised confidentiality. Locy wants to honor her promise and Hatfill wants to discover what the source said and knows.

A federal shield law would provide guidance to Judge Walton in balancing the various interests involved in these difficult cases—guidance that would probably be welcomed?1

Pod:

Web:

  • UPDATED 03/16/2008 AP, Recently Subpoenaed Journalists. Subpoenaed for information concerning their confidential sources.
  • AP, Judge May Hold Reporter in Contempt

-----notes-----

1. Locking Locy up interferes with her first amendment right to speak or not speak (separate from and in addition to her right to remain silent in a criminal case); interferes with a lawful contractual promise between private individuals; harms the public when information is not made available that would otherwise be available, with anonymity or confidentiality; harms a reporter's ability to effectively and meaningfully report; may enable effective use of the judicial process to address a wrong or right.

The House has overwhelmingly passed the Free Flow of Information Act of 2007 (S. 1267) and it is awaiting passage in the Senate.

No feedback yet

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
March 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Search

XML Feeds

powered by b2evolution